These shots by Carlo Van de Roer look like pure and unfiltered tranquility. I’ve never been to Iceland before, but this series captures what I imagine it would be like. It looks freezing and potentially dangerous, but still somehow soothing and comfortable. Probably the most immediately noticeable aspect of these images is the inclusion of the colorful floating orbs. Personally I love them, and I think they are the reason his work has picked up so much recognition. They are a unique touch that brings a little bit of extra magic to his already stunning photography. I’ve read he screen prints the orbs onto the photographs, but I can’t find any information regarding the concept behind the orbs. Perhaps it’s just an aesthetic choice, but I would imagine (and prefer) that there is some deeper conceptual reason for their placement.
Carlo Van de Roer
04.01.2009
simply beautiful
yes! …was just perusing his site the other day and really enjoyed these orb shots within a landscape. very nice and a great post indeed alex.
reminds me of an Album Leaf song.
The photos are beautiful, but the dots are a bit gimmicky to me – simply a way to attract attention.
I feel like the orbs represent some kind of omnipresence in the photos and they almost seem like relics or observers…I think that’s why I like them so much
…or maybe that’s completely over analyzed, but as alex said, I’d like to think they have a deeper meaning that just an eye-catcher
I guess the dots turn what are just really nice photos into something more contemporary and arty. I guess he wants people to see his stuff and think ‘ah yeah it’s the dot guy’. Personally I think his photos stand strong enough by themselves without the need for anything more thought provoking.
what I really like is maybe not the meanin,g but that a coloured circle can change (maybe even enhance?) a photo so much
what I really like is maybe not just the meaning, but that a coloured circle can change (maybe even enhance?) a photo so much.
There is also something to be said for the color choice and compositional placement of the circles. I think in each case the color and placement are spot on, and obviously very carefully considered. If he hadn’t got those right, this would be a different conversation haha
I think they’d be more compelling sans the dot. They’re very quiet photos in the first place and the dot disturbs that peace and their natural beauty. Although for some reason, the dot is kind of fitting in the last one. It does have that omnipresence thing going for it. I should take a look at these at larger scale because it’s hard to see what’s really going on in them.
^^^^^I agree
this was clearly an april fools day joke guys.
this was clearly an april fools day joke guys.
lose the dots.
personally i don’t find the placement, size or colour in any of them particularly proper. the dot in the second one is just way too big, it overwhelms the photo and completely hogs focus in an otherwise amazing shot AND composition. i would have appreciated some more subtle, but still very colourful choice other than some of the most overplayed colour choices in the world today (cyan? magenta? come on!). the photos are so much nicer, let them stand on their own.
on a semi-related sidenote, i’ve always found ikue mori particularly adept at composing imagery, text, graphic elements and dots/circles in her work.
At first glance, I hated the dots, but the second time around they became more meaningful. I definitely think it’s all about the placement, although they would be better without them…
They aren’t just dots. They are orbs! Reinterpret that for yourselves.
I saw this work when i was in college and it inspired me to
do a similar piece but instead of them floating in random space
mine where coving faces of people i had photographed. It worked
quite well but not as well as these images haha.
Great!! Me likes sim-ple too